Trust and data governance
Explore Byaan's controls for access, exports, and change review, then identify what your institution needs to examine. Make platform evaluation a clear discussion between operations, technology, and decision-makers.
Controls are reviewed according to the product, enabled services, and settings.
Start by reviewing what each role needs to complete its work.
Perform assigned tasks
Review authorised cases
Manage access and settings
An illustrative allocation. The institution configures its own roles and permissions.
Controls in everyday work
Four practical areas for reviewing access to institutional data and processes.
Byaan supports roles and permissions across administration, teaching, and learning. Institutions can define each member's authorised tasks instead of sharing an administrator account.
In the demo: ask to try the action with an authorised role and one with limited permissions.
The data structure links institutional records to their scope and uses that relationship when accessing related records. Access scope is reviewed alongside user permissions and the service.
During evaluation: define the institution's boundaries and which teams need data access.
Protected export workflows include verification and logging controls, connecting the action to its user and report type. Available protection depends on the workflow and its settings.
In the demo: review who requests an export, how verification works, and where its record appears.
Specific workflows, such as cohort attendance corrections and programme results, include a correction reason and record version checks. This helps explain later decisions.
In the demo: ask for a correction example showing the reason, previous version, and review process.
Prepare your review requirements
Choose priorities to see specific questions and who needs to resolve them. Selections run locally and can be carried into a contact draft.
Initial choices you can change.
We need defined roles and a clear owner for each task, separating sensitive duties wherever possible.
A demonstration with authorised and limited roles, and how permissions change when responsibilities change.
Decision owner within the institutionThe institution administrator and each process owner.
We need to identify the reports required, who may export them, and their intended use.
The verification process for protected exports, the operation log, and file controls applied according to settings.
Decision owner within the institutionThe data owner and permissions administrator.
Text you can select and copy. It contains no personal data and is not an audit result.
Your summary is prepared on your device. It is not sent until you open a contact channel and approve it.
Governance that continues with the work
The institution turns controls into simple procedures with timing and ownership the team understands.
Give them their own account and an appropriate role, try the required task, and explain what they may access.
Define the purpose, recipients, and minimum data needed. Review export controls and how the file is stored within your institution.
Review old permissions, update assignments, and decide who takes over open tasks and their related data.
Trust and data governance
Answers that distinguish what the product demonstrates from what needs an agreement.
This page helps organise the review and identify examples to request. Your institution's requirements, usage scope, and contractual documents remain part of the supplier evaluation before approval.
This page does not publish an unverified uptime percentage or certification. Choose service continuity to prepare a request for the documents, operational scope, and commitments you need to review.
Each area has its own controls. Guardian access applies to the school product and requires the right relationship, consent, and permissions. Export and correction controls depend on the service workflow and settings.
Your selections remain on your device while you use the page. When you open contact, the summary travels with you for review and approval before sending. Avoid entering sensitive information.
Bring operations and technology together around specific examples, then discuss what needs configuring or documenting before deciding.
